SEO constitution for Search Engines – users point of view
License search engines are not written only for webmasters, but also for ordinary users, plowing the internet spaces in order to find relevant information. And as with the search engine had already “worked” optimizers, sometimes beloved PC gives the visitor does not need information – from the category given at the beginning of the example. But even here, PS is completely removed from the responsibility – under a license, a search engine does not have to do with the quality and content pages, which you can find with it. As Yandex says , he’s only mirror you’ll ever need, not the censor. For all this, the search engine can bring harm to the user in the following cases: 1. Irrelevant issue: – the user spends his time trying to find information; – in this case, the user spends more money on searching for information. Traffic in runet not yet free. In addition, the money is spent on unnecessary visits to user sites, issued by a search engine on the front pages. 2. Using a search engine, anyone can find the information that the user wishes to hide. 3. Using a search engine can cause damage to reputation of a person. Take, for instance the example of so-called linkbombing when the site is a search engine for discordant request, it is not the appropriate category of the resource. Check out Renegade Recession Made Millionaire
After all, the easiest way to do mischief to man – to publish defamatory information about him. And it seems that users have every reason to complain to the substation to the court: 1. For that, thanks to someone’s “joke”, the site was in the issue of discordant request. 2. For violation of the so-called “copyright.” Most claims are directed to the fact that search engine “no demand” and that indexes sites with search engines kopipastery find and steal someone else’s content. 3. For the opportunity to find any information about the user. But the precedent treatment of Russian Internet users to the court even as much as the part of SEO, that is, zero. 
by VinothChandar under CC-SA The question of legal liability to the users of search engines is new not only to the Russian legal reality, but also for the legal systems of other countries. Thus, in the UK first action the user to the search engine has been presented only in July this year. And this is considering that in 2007 the SS celebrated its fourteenth year . Retkin Brian (Brian Retkin), the owner of the company engaged in domain name registration services, accused Google search engine that in its handling of the request to remove from the search results are links to sites containing defaming his information, PS did not react properly and links continue to appear. There is case law according to which search engines are not responsible for the content of sites found by users of search engines. However, under English law a company can be held liable if it has been advised that its actions violate anyone’s rights, but do not take steps to eliminate the violations. Retkin Brian says that for three years tried to convince Google to remove from the search results links, which contained false information about his company. Before the English Court is now the question is whether this principle of responsibility to spread the activities of network search engines. It is clear that a positive answer to this question will have serious consequences for such a legal institution of freedom of information. Attempts to placing the responsibility on the search engine for providing links to sites that contain illegal content (defamation, incitement of extremist, pornography, etc.) due to the fact that often the direct distribution of such information can not be established. Messages posted on Web sites anonymously, domain registered to a nonexistent company, and search service to identify the owner, it is usually possible. So he turns out to be “extreme.” But it’s in the UK with a search engine can dish. In Russia, the legislation protects search engines from liability for the content of sites they found. In accordance with Article 17 of the Law “On Information, Information Technologies and Information Protection,” a person shall not be liability for the dissemination of illegal content, if its services are in the “transfer of information provided by another person subject to transfer without change and corrections ” . His attitude to indexing sites Yandex explained in paragraph 4 of its license , “Yandex indexes the public portion of the Internet – the pages that are available when you click on a link without a login and password, and indexing are not prohibited in robots.txt of the site “. The site owner can disable it for indexing in search engines, placing an tag «noindex» in the file robots.txt, which are written instructions on how to index your site for search engines. Those users who are “offended” by the search engine for website indexed forget: one of the properties Internet – accessibility. That is, any person using the network and spread information on any site should be aware that this information can be seen by other users. And just in case of exposure to an information resource, by editing the code, access to information may be limited. As an example: if you are doing in public what they wanted to hide from prying eyes, do not be surprised if someone sees you and will point the finger. As for the claims of the second type, too, all clearly spelled out in the license, “Yandex indexes sites by independent individuals and organizations. We are not responsible for the quality and content of the pages that you can find by using our search engine. ” Also, PS protects all of the same Article 17 of the Law “On Information, Information Technologies and Information Protection.” And again, all the perturbations users on forums do not go. According to Natalia Sukharev , documentary claims users and use cases for submission to the court Rambler was not. Single complaints were resolved at the stage of phone calls. That is, users do not see any point where a turn, so they do not believe in the judicial system, or simply what is called a “blow in the air.” But in fact, and in another case, experienced only seoshniki mock offended users . If you like this then check out Renegade Recession Made Millionaire Bonus
- http://renegaderecessionmademillionaire.com
